INTERVIEW — HANS VON SPAKOVSKY –  former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights in the Justice Department, former commissioner for the Federal Election Commission from 2006 to 2007 and senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation – discussed the citizenship question being reinstated in the next census, the plan by twelve different states to sue the Trump administration over this, and whether or not the Obama Campaign in 2012 violated campaign finance laws

• Commerce Department says citizenship question will be reinstated in 2020 Census.  (CNN) In a controversial move, the Commerce Department announced Monday that the question of citizenship will again be included in the 2020 Census. The move comes at the request of the Justice Department, first made in the early days of the administration, saying it was needed to better enforce the Voting Rights Act.
• TWELVE states plan to sue the Trump administration in a bid to block them from asking everyone if they are a citizen in 2020 US Census. (Daily Mail) — New York State attorney general Eric T. Schneiderman said on Tuesday he was leading a multi-state lawsuit over the Census citizenship question. Trump administration said on Monday it would reintroduce a question about citizenship status in the 2020 US Census.    Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Washington plan to join the lawsuit. California already announced on Monday that it would sue.
• Did Facebook’s ‘favors’ for the Obama campaign constitute a violation of federal law? (Fox News) — Controversy continues to swirl around how the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica obtained personal data from over 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge and used it to target ads to individuals in an effort to help Donald Trump be elected president in 2016. But a more serious case of apparent misconduct involves Facebook data going to a different presidential campaign – this time in 2012. In this case, which is getting far less attention, Facebook reportedly voluntarily provided data on millions of its users to the re-election campaign of President Obama. If true, such action by Facebook may constitute a major violation of federal campaign finance law as an illegal corporate campaign contribution. The matter should be investigated by the Federal Election Commission – an agency I am quite familiar with, because I served as one of its commissioners from 2006 to 2007. The commission enforces campaign finance laws for congressional and presidential elections. A federal law bans corporations from making “direct or indirect” contributions to federal candidates. That ban extends beyond cash contributions to “any services, or anything of value.” In other words, corporations cannot provide federal candidates with free services of any kind. Under the Federal Election Commission’s regulations, “anything of value” includes any “in-kind contribution.” For example, if a corporation decided to offer a presidential candidate free office space, that would violate federal law. Corporations can certainly offer their services, including office space, to federal campaigns. But the campaigns are required to pay the fair market value for such services or rental properties.